| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The labels are parsed and stored into symbol table
but expressions dependent on symbols values are not evaluated.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Instructions description in instruction.cpp has been
pragmatically augmented by tool based on Python MIPS simulator,
hazards analyzer
https://github.com/ppisa/apo-simarch
That code has been originally distilled from from GNU
binutils sources.
Implementation is now inline with my original proposal
Previous solution gets untenable with more complex
instructions and its complexity would grow extremely.
MIPS instruction set with coprocessor instructions
which use sel field, rd used as index, rt as destination
and other peculiarities in newer versions cannot
be processed based on basic CPU control signals.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
exception.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Instruction parsing is rough and does not support branch offset computation.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
BGEZALL.
GCC generates these opcodes for default compilation mode.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Memory stage is chosen to be exception commit stage.
Instructions flow postponed and stages holding following
instructions are cleaned. Processing of syscall at decode
stage as jump to the handler would be better solution
in real hardware but for future emulated syscalls
it is better to reach consistent state of registers.
Memory access caused exceptions would require cleanup
even in real hardware.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
independent.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remaining are MOVZ and MOVN in the execution phase
and all branch and jump operations in handle_pc().
Signed-off-by: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This allows to specify requirement for RS and RD on instruction
basis even for T_R / ALU instructions.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz>
|
|
|
|
| |
THere are exceptions when we care about forwarding and when we don't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In reality this internally allows us to see stages even it we are not
using pipelining but that is hidden from outside simply to not confuse
user.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is rude implementation. We always print all fields. In future we
should add flags to set what fields should be hidden on per instruction
bases.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For core testing we want to compare whole memory and registers.
Registers are pretty simple but in case of memory it is some what more
complicated and required its own tests to be sure that it works.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Well I should commit every change instead of this madness. I am not
documenting changes as all this is just improvements and implementation
progression.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Adding work done so far.
|