From 9439c6f1caffd938673018f3af7460b33a12528e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Karel=20Ko=C4=8D=C3=AD?= Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 16:39:30 +0100 Subject: Another work progress --- docs/miscellanoues/jobs_vs_tasks.md | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) create mode 100644 docs/miscellanoues/jobs_vs_tasks.md (limited to 'docs/miscellanoues/jobs_vs_tasks.md') diff --git a/docs/miscellanoues/jobs_vs_tasks.md b/docs/miscellanoues/jobs_vs_tasks.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..17d7fdd --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/miscellanoues/jobs_vs_tasks.md @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +Jobs vs. Tasks +============== +This document refers to [Jobs](/parts/jobs.md) and [Tasks](/parts/tasks.md). + +You should be familiar with threads from other platforms. Tasks are from usability +point of view almost same. They are switched according their priority and +availability. Jobs are different. They are designed to execute single function at +the time and when this function exits it executes another. It cant interrupt +execution when more important task come. So why use jobs instead of tasks? Task +requires for their run stack memory and during whole live of task is this memory +taken. This limits number of tasks running. Jobs are sharing same stack and only +one function has data on it at the time. This results in less memory consumption. +Another huge difference is how planing works. Tasks are planned based on priority. +Task with higher priority will run unless it isn't suspended. Jobs don't have +priority, but they have to specify time until they should be finished (deadline) +and duration of execution. With these two parameters jobs planner can plan their +execution. -- cgit v1.2.3